Michel Drucker and Marie Portolano: The host’s shocking comments

Incident between Michel Drucker and Marie Portolano over questions deemed misogynistic

A controversial interview interaction

During his appearance on the show “Quelle époque!”, Michel Drucker, the emblematic face of “Vivement Dimanche”, adopted a posture which triggered a wave of negative reactions. Questioning Marie Portolano about the credibility of her suffering linked to sexism in the world of sports journalism, her paternalistic attitude cast doubt on the importance of the problem she exposed in her documentary “I’m not a slut, I’m a journalist “. The presenter’s ambiguous smiles in the face of the reality of proven sexism generated obvious unease on the set.

Immediate reactions following the remarks

• Feeling of discomfort on set: Drucker asked insistent questions about the inappropriate behavior that Portolano might have suffered, despite the journalist’s explanations about the veracity and extent of the problem.
• Intervention by Léa Salamé: Trying to divert attention from the growing tension, she recalled the context surrounding the documentary, highlighting the plurality of testimonies on sexism in sports journalism.

The web is outraged

Social media users were quick to express their displeasure at what they perceive as a lack of respect and blatant condescension from Michel Drucker, calling him a “fossil.” Charlotte Namura, another figure in sports journalism, deplored this skeptical attitude online, stressing that the persistent doubting of their words is harmful and demonstrates deep denial.

Voices of solidarity and sharp criticism

Several presenters such as Vanessa Le Moigne offered their support to Marie Portolano, noting the irresponsibility of a past generation and problematic education on issues of sexism, echoing inappropriate behavior still too present in the world of sport.

Conclusion: A revealing clash

The exchange between Michel Drucker and Marie Portolano revealed much more than divergent opinions. It highlighted the persistent challenges linked to the recognition of sexism in the professional environment and the difficult acceptance of this reality by certain media figures anchored in their convictions. The episode served as a catalyst, prompting a broader awakening on the issue of fair treatment in the workplace.